简报·YT
← 返回 GitHub 动态
DietrichGebert/ponytail · 📈 热门项目 已完成

DietrichGebert/ponytail v5.1.0

2026-10-08 16:20 · ⭐ 15.9万 · GitHub Release 原文 ↗
#技术债管理 #AI编程助手 #版本发布

DietrichGebert/ponytail v5.1.0

项目简介

Ponytail 是一个面向 AI 编码代理(如 Claude Code)的项目:它让 AI 在写代码时主动标记出"故意走的捷径"(例如临时绕过某个限制、先写死一个值),并留下升级/偿还技术债的条件,之后可以通过 /ponytail-debt 这类命令把它们全部找出来,避免这些临时决定随着代码一起"沉底"。它值得关注的原因是:AI 生成代码的速度远快于人工审查速度,而"哪些地方是明知不完整但先这么写"恰恰是最容易丢失、也最危险的上下文。

注:Release Notes 中未给出完整产品说明,以上项目定位由 /ponytail-debt 命令、CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md 配置约定及注释标记机制推断而来。

一句话概括

v5.1.0 让 Ponytail 不再把自己的品牌名写进用户的代码注释,改用中立的 shortcut: 标记,同时保证旧标记仍可被检索,账本不丢。

要点

▸ Release Notes 英文原文(827 字符)
Ponytail no longer writes its name into your code. Deliberate shortcuts are now marked with a neutral comment, `shortcut: <the limit>, <when to upgrade>`, and `/ponytail-debt` still finds the old `ponytail:` ones, so nothing in your ledger gets lost. Want another word, or none at all? Say so in your project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md and run `/ponytail-debt <your word>`. Measured against 5.0.0 before shipping: same number of markers, same pass rate, same cost. ## What's Changed * feat: neutral shortcut: marker instead of the ponytail: brand in code comments by @DietrichGebert in https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail/pull/1068 * chore: release v5.1.0 by @DietrichGebert in https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail/pull/1069 **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail/compare/v5.0.0...v5.1.0
▸ 主项目介绍 · DietrichGebert/ponytail
▸ README 原文(同步于 2026-10-08 12:18)
<p align="center"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="assets/logo-dark.png"> <img src="assets/logo.png" width="220" alt="Ponytail, the lazy senior dev"> </picture> </p> <h1 align="center">Ponytail</h1> <p align="center"> <em>He says nothing. He writes one line. It works.</em> </p> <p align="center"> <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668?utm_source=repository-badge&amp;utm_medium=badge&amp;utm_campaign=badge-repository-50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/repositories/50668" alt="DietrichGebert%2Fponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a> </p> <p align="center"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/DietrichGebert/ponytail?style=flat-square&color=111111&label=stars" alt="Stars"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/v/release/DietrichGebert/ponytail?style=flat-square&color=111111&label=release" alt="Release"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@dietrichgebert/ponytail?style=flat-square&color=111111&label=npm" alt="npm"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/works%20with-20%20agents-111111?style=flat-square" alt="Works with 20 agents"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-111111?style=flat-square" alt="MIT license"> </p> <p align="center"> <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/daily" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a> <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/weekly" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a> <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668?utm_source=trendshift-badge&amp;utm_medium=badge&amp;utm_campaign=badge-trendshift-50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/monthly?language=JavaScript" alt="DietrichGebert%2Fponytail | Trendshift monthly ranking" width="250" height="55"/></a> </p> <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/hero.jpg" width="880" alt="Ponytail 5, rebuilt from the ground up: -53% code, -41% time, -26% cost, -45% tokens. And yet 98% of risky logic ships with a test, without Ponytail 68%."> </p> <p align="center"> <strong>Ponytail 5: rebuilt from the ground up.</strong><br> <strong>-53% code &middot; -41% time &middot; -26% cost &middot; -45% tokens</strong><br> <strong>And yet: 98% of risky logic ships with a test.</strong> Without Ponytail: 68%.<br> <sub>Benchmarked in Claude Code, the same agent with and without the skill: 39 tasks including a real FastAPI + React repo, Opus 5.5, 5 runs each. <a href="#numbers">Details</a>.</sub> </p> <p align="center"> <sub><a href="i18n/README.es.md">Español</a> &middot; <a href="i18n/README.ko.md">한국어</a> &middot; <a href="i18n/README.zh-CN.md">简体中文</a> &middot; <a href="i18n/README.ja.md">日本語</a></sub> </p> --- <p align="center"> <a href="https://ponytail.dev/soon"><img src="assets/waitlist-banner.png" alt="Something's coming, join the waitlist" width="760"></a> </p> ## Already built with Ponytail <a href="https://theretriever.app"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="assets/retriever-logo-dark.svg"> <img src="assets/retriever-logo-light.svg" height="128" alt="Retriever"> </picture> </a> --- You know him. Long ponytail. Oval glasses. Has been at the company longer than the version control. You show him fifty lines; he looks at them, says nothing, and replaces them with one. Ponytail puts him inside your AI agent. ## Numbers <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/chart.png" width="880" alt="Share of the no-skill baseline. Lines of code: Ponytail v4.13 52%, Ponytail 5 47%. Output tokens: 57% and 55%. Cost: 84% and 74%. Time: 62% and 59%."> </p> <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/tests.png" width="880" alt="Half the code, and yet better: 98% of risky logic ships with a test (no skill 68%); the agent's own tests catch 66% of injected bugs (no skill 46%)."> </p> Two things the chart does not show: in a blind comparison, Ponytail 5's replies beat the previous Ponytail's 110 to 67. And on the six security tasks (SQL injection, path traversal, forged tokens, rate limiting, malformed CSV rows, caching) it passed all 30 runs: less code, no less safe. Method, per-task tables and limits: [benchmarks/results/2026-10-07-agentic.md](benchmarks/results/2026-10-07-agentic.md). **The rule was never "fewest tokens."** It is: write only what the task needs, and never cut validation, error handling, security, or accessibility. The code ends up small because it is necessary, not golfed. Lower cost and latency are a side effect. ## Before / after <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/beforeafter.png" width="880" alt="Add a date picker to the frontend. No skill: 335 lines, a calendar and a date picker built by hand. Ponytail 5: one 10-line file that reuses the repo's Input with type date, so the browser brings the calendar."> </p> You ask for a date picker. Without Ponytail, the agent installs a date picker library or builds a whole calendar by hand: 335 lines. Ponytail 5 first looks at what is already there: the repo has an `Input` component, and every browser has a date picker. It puts the two together. 10 lines. More survivors in [examples/](examples/). ## The review, rebuilt <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/review.png" width="880" alt="The review, rebuilt. A real /ponytail-review finding from the benchmark: the change renamed a field, and an untouched file, src/routes/feed.js, now crashes. Must fix: the Atom feed now crashes on every request, with what this is, the problem, the fix, and what happens if we skip it. 100% of planted problems found, no skill 87%. 100% of problems outside the diff found, no skill 78%."> </p> `/ponytail-review` used to look only for code to cut. Now it reviews like the senior dev who gets paged when it breaks: it reads the code your change touches, not just the diff, and checks bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to cut. Each finding says what the code does, what goes wrong, how to fix it, and what happens if you don't. ## The audit, rebuilt <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/audit.png" width="880" alt="Your whole repo, ranked. Fix this first. A real /ponytail-audit from the benchmark on a warehouse stock repo: 1 must fix, office batches with 1,200 fail completely; 2 must fix, the import silently skips bad rows; 3 must fix, a mistyped SKU in an office batch is silently ignored; 4 should fix, the risky code paths have no tests; 5 nice to have, the API crashes on a body that isn't an object. Verdict: fix 1 first."> </p> `/ponytail-audit` runs the same checks on the whole repo. It maps the code first: entry points, how data moves, what load the project expects. Then it ranks what it finds and tells you what to fix first. The old audit only listed what to delete. ## How it works <p align="center"> <img src="assets/v5/ladder.png" width="880" alt="Before writing code, stop at the first rung that holds: 1 does this need to exist, 2 already in this codebase, 3 does the standard library do it, 4 a native platform feature, 5 an installed dependency, 6 can it be one line, 7 only then the minimum that works, plus one small test if it has logic."> </p> The ladder runs *after* it understands the problem, not instead of it: it reads the code the change touches and traces the real flow before picking a rung. Lazy about the solution, never about reading. Lazy, not negligent: trust-boundary validation, data-loss handling, security, and accessibility are never on the chopping block. Logic with a branch, a loop, a parser, money or security leaves one small test behind. Every reply ends with what was skipped or not checked and any risk you should know. ## The prompt Ponytail is one prompt: [`skills/ponytail/SKILL.md`](skills/ponytail/SKILL.md). The compact version, for agents that read a rules file, is [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md). Everything else in this repo loads that prompt into different agents. ## Install **Claude Code**, as two separate prompts: ``` /plugin marketplace add DietrichGebert/ponytail ``` ``` /plugin install ponytail@ponytail ``` **Codex:** ```bash codex plugin marketplace add DietrichGebert/ponytail codex plugin add ponytail@ponytail ``` Then open `/hooks` in Codex, trust its two lifecycle hooks, and start a new thread. **Any other agent:** copy [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md) into your project, or ask your agent to install [`skills/ponytail/SKILL.md`](skills/ponytail/SKILL.md) as a skill. Step by step for Copilot, Cursor, OpenCode, Gemini and the rest: **[INSTALL.md](INSTALL.md)**. That was it. He'd be proud. He won't say it. Active every session, with a handful of commands (see [Commands](#commands)). `/ponytail ultra` exists for when the codebase has wronged you personally. Startup and mode-change text shows the current mode. Only install ponytail from `DietrichGebert/ponytail` on GitHub or `@dietrichgebert/ponytail` on npm. It never ships `.exe` or `.dll` files; a copy that does is not mine. ## Commands | Command | What it does | |---------|--------------| | `/ponytail [lite \| full \| ultra \| off]` | Set the intensity, or turn it off. No argument switches ponytail on at the default level if it is off, and otherwise reports the current level. | | `/ponytail-review` | Review the current diff like the senior dev who gets paged when it breaks: bugs, security, real load, risky code without a test, slow paths, and what to cut. Each finding says what the code does, what goes wrong, how to fix it, and what happens if you don't. Name a target in plain words to narrow or widen it: `uncommitted`, `staged`, `branch`, or a PR link. | | `/ponytail-audit` | The same check for the whole repo, most important first. | | `/ponytail-debt` | Harvest the `ponytail:` shortcuts you've deferred into a ledger, so "later" doesn't become "never". | | `/ponytail-gain` | Show the measured impact scoreboard (less code, less cost, more speed) from the benchmark. | | `/ponytail-help` | Quick reference for the commands above. | Commands need a skill-capable host (Claude Code, Codex, Devin CLI, OpenCode, Gemini, pi, Hermes Agent, Qoder, Grok Build). In Codex CLI and the IDE extension they're skills under the plugin's namespace; invoke with `$ponytail:ponytail-review`. Cursor with the [hooks](INSTALL.md#cursor) gets `/ponytail` level switching only, typed as a plain message. The instruction-only adapters (Cursor's rule file, Windsurf, Cline, Copilot, Kiro, Antigravity) load the always-on ruleset without the commands. ## FAQ **Does it need a config file?** No. An optional `~/.config/ponytail/config.json` or `PONYTAIL_DEFAULT_MODE` env var can set the default level, but nothing is required. **What if I really need the 120-line cache class?** You don't. Insist anyway and he'll build it. Slowly. Correctly. While looking at you. **Does it scale?** The code you never wrote scales infinitely. Zero bugs, zero CVEs, 100% uptime since forever. **Why "ponytail"?** You know exactly why. ## Sponsors <p align="center"> <a href="https://greenpt.com/"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="assets/logo-greenpt-dark.svg"> <img src="assets/logo-greenpt.svg" width="260" alt="GreenPT"> </picture> </a> </p> ## License [MIT](LICENSE). The shortest license that works. ## Star History <a href="https://www.star-history.com/dietrichgebert/ponytail#history"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.star-history.com/chart?repos=DietrichGebert/ponytail&type=Date&theme=dark" /> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://api.star-history.com/chart?repos=DietrichGebert/ponytail&type=Date" /> <img alt="Star History Chart" src="https://api.star-history.com/chart?repos=DietrichGebert/ponytail&type=Date" /> </picture> </a>